Abstract
AbstractScience performance is highly affected by students’ reading comprehension. Recently, there has been a growing attention to the role of linguistic features for science performance, but findings are ambivalent, especially when looking into item word count. The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of students’ reading comprehension and item word count of given science measures on performance, controlling for students’ cognitive abilities, gender, family language, and school track. The sample consisted of N = 2051 German students in grades 10 and 11. Students completed (scientific) literacy measures. We then applied a multilevel logistic regression to investigate the hypothesized interaction effect of reading comprehension and word count on students’ science performance. The results showed a significant interaction of students’ reading comprehension and word count on science performance, controlling for several covariates. Particularly students with high reading comprehension benefit from science items with increasing word count. Our findings empirically support previous research, showing that reading comprehension is crucial for science performance and enhances the interaction between reading comprehension and linguistic features of written text in science subjects. Finally, theoretical and practical implications and limitations of this study are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference86 articles.
1. Abedi, J., Courtney, M., & Leon, S. (2003). Effectiveness and validity of accommodations for English language learners in large-scale assessments (CSE Report No. 608). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Baumert, J., Bos, W., & Lehmann, R. (2000). TIMSS/III Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie – mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn [TIMSS/III The Third International Mathematics and Science Study – Mathematical and scientific education at the end of school career]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83411-9.
3. Bayat, N., Sekercioglu, G., & Bakir, S. (2014). The relationship between reading comprehension and success in science. Education in Science, 39, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3693.
4. Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Burton, M. W., & Haendiges, A. N. (2004). Comprehension of reversible sentences in aphasia: the effects of verb meaning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000456.
5. Bird, E., & Welford, G. (1995). The effect of language on the performance of second-language students in science examinations. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170309.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献