The sound of silence: children’s own perspectives on their hearing and listening in classrooms with different acoustic conditions

Author:

Vettori GiuliaORCID,Di Leonardo Laura,Secchi Simone,Bigozzi Lucia

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we investigated primary school children’s perspectives on their hearing and listening in classrooms with different acoustic quality levels. The sample included 213 children. The children completed a self-report questionnaire rating how well they could hear and listen in various situations in classrooms with two different acoustic conditions: Poor acoustic quality (long reverberation time [Long RT]) versus Adequate acoustic quality (short reverberation time [Short RT]) equipped with a sound-absorbing system. The results showed that auditory perception in the two conditions depends on the child’s age, with only fourth- and fifth-grade children reporting benefits from classroom acoustic correction. Our study provides preliminary results on children’s perspectives regarding their hearing and listening experiences during school learning, drawing out the implications for the design and implementation of school metacognitive interventions aimed at improving children’s and teachers’ awareness of motivational-affective, regulative, and environmental aspects favoring listening at school.

Funder

Savings Bank Foundation of Florence

Università degli Studi di Firenze

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. Anderson, K. L. (2001). Voicing concern about noisy classrooms. Educational Leadership, 58, 77–79.

2. Amodeo, V., & Secchi, S. (2023). Acoustic Comfort and Accessibility at School. Cluster Environmental Accessibility, 110–117

3. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature reviews neuroscience, 4, 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201

4. Bandalos, D. L., & Gerstner, J. J. (2016). Using factor analysis in test construction. In K. Schweizer & C. DiStefano (Eds.), Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advances (pp. 26–51). Hogrefe.

5. Behling, O., & Law, K. S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986373

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3