Abstract
AbstractIn this study, we investigated primary school children’s perspectives on their hearing and listening in classrooms with different acoustic quality levels. The sample included 213 children. The children completed a self-report questionnaire rating how well they could hear and listen in various situations in classrooms with two different acoustic conditions: Poor acoustic quality (long reverberation time [Long RT]) versus Adequate acoustic quality (short reverberation time [Short RT]) equipped with a sound-absorbing system. The results showed that auditory perception in the two conditions depends on the child’s age, with only fourth- and fifth-grade children reporting benefits from classroom acoustic correction. Our study provides preliminary results on children’s perspectives regarding their hearing and listening experiences during school learning, drawing out the implications for the design and implementation of school metacognitive interventions aimed at improving children’s and teachers’ awareness of motivational-affective, regulative, and environmental aspects favoring listening at school.
Funder
Savings Bank Foundation of Florence
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Anderson, K. L. (2001). Voicing concern about noisy classrooms. Educational Leadership, 58, 77–79.
2. Amodeo, V., & Secchi, S. (2023). Acoustic Comfort and Accessibility at School. Cluster Environmental Accessibility, 110–117
3. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature reviews neuroscience, 4, 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
4. Bandalos, D. L., & Gerstner, J. J. (2016). Using factor analysis in test construction. In K. Schweizer & C. DiStefano (Eds.), Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advances (pp. 26–51). Hogrefe.
5. Behling, O., & Law, K. S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986373