1. ZipperJ., MedelM., PasteneL. and RiveraM. (1974). Factors that limit the efficacy of copper-carrying IUDs. In:Intrauterine Devices: Development, Evaluation and Program Implementation. R.G.Wheeler, G.W.Duncan, J.J.Speidel, eds. Academic Press, New York
2. VanOsW.A.A., EdelmanD.A. and BadrawiH.H. (1987). The future of intrauterine contraception.Adv. Contracept.,3, 227–235
3. Van Os, W.A.A., Rhemrev, P.E.R., Bomert, L. and Aartsen, E.J. (1974). Experience with a combined multiload intrauterine device. Paper presented at the 8th World Congress of Fertility and Sterility, November 3–9, Buenos Aires, Argentina
4. VanOsW.A.A., HaspelsA.A., RhemrevP.E.R., LoenderslootE.W., LoSin SjoeE. and deNooyerC.A.A. (1977). Evaluation comparative du MLCu250.Rev. Franc. Gynec.,72, 829–832
5. ThieryM., ven derPasH., VanOsW.A.A., TauberP.F., DombrowiczN., MacDonaldJ.S., HaspelsA.A., DrogendijkA.C., vanKetsH. and BoogersW. (1979). Three years' experience with the MLCu250, a new copper-wired intrauterine contraceptive device.Br. J. Fam. Plan.,5(2), 36–38