How Do Executive Functions Influence Children’s Reasoning About Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science?
-
Published:2023-09-21
Issue:3-4
Volume:7
Page:257-275
-
ISSN:2509-3290
-
Container-title:Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Cogn Enhanc
Author:
Dumontheil Iroise, Wilkinson Hannah R., Farran Emily K., Smid Claire, Modhvadia Roshni, Mareschal DenisORCID, Bell Derek, Brookman-Byrne Annie, Gauthier Andrea, de Jong Roos, Holmes Wayne, Mayer Sveta, Morris Su, Porayska-Pomsta Kaśka, Sumanapala Dilini, Thomas Michael, Tolmie Andy,
Abstract
AbstractMany scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4, 296–314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.
Funder
Wellcome Trust Education Endowment Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Energy
Reference94 articles.
1. Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). 2. Berkman, E. T., Kahn, L. E., & Merchant, J. S. (2014). Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(1), 149–157. 3. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging mathematics and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647–663. 4. Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2014). The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1249–1285. 5. Brault Foisy, L.-M., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2015). Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(1–2), 26–36.
|
|