Abstract
AbstractEvidence suggests that integrated support, combining both natural and formal supports, is often essential for individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve their preferred quality of life. However, studies are limited on how to organize supports so that people with developmental disabilities and their families find a balance between formal and natural supports. Often, there are systemic and personal boundaries around the nature and extent of support that can be offered to persons with developmental disabilities through formal mechanisms, yet the value of natural supports in the lives of persons with developmental disabilities is often undervalued in society. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to explore formal support providers’ perspectives on (a) the unique skillsets and attributes of natural support providers and formal support providers; and (b) how we might best enable both natural and formal supports for persons with developmental disabilities and their families. Following a qualitative approach, we interviewed 16 formal support providers working with adults with developmental disabilities and their families via Zoom. We analyzed data using thematic analysis. We organized results into three themes: the role of natural supports, the role of formal supports, and strategies to best configure a system of supports. Results imply that there is a need for investment of funding to incentivize both support structures for adults with developmental disabilities and their families. Future studies should explore the perspectives from people with developmental disabilities and their natural support providers.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Ball, S., Panter, S., Redley, M., Proctor, C. A., Byrne, K., Clare, I., & Holland, A. (2012). The extent and nature of need for mealtime support among adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01488.x.
2. Ballin, L., & Balandin, S. (2007). An exploration of loneliness: Communication and the social networks of older people with cerebral palsy. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701689256.
3. Berry, S. J., & Domene, J. F. (2015). Supporting postsecondary students with sensory or mobility impairments in reaching their career aspirations. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413490792.
4. Biason, R. (2022). Family caregivers traumatized by COVID-19 lockdowns that limited access to those in long-term care: Study. University of Toronto News. Retrieved August 12, 2023 from https://www.utoronto.ca/news/family-caregivers-traumatized-covid-19-lockdowns-limited-access-those-long-term-care-study.
5. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献