Abstract
AbstractAcetylcholine can excite neurons by suppressing M-type (KCNQ) potassium channels. This effect is mediated by M1 muscarinic receptors coupled to the Gq protein. Although PIP2 depletion and PKC activation have been strongly suggested to contribute to muscarinic inhibition of M currents (IM), direct evidence is lacking. We investigated the mechanism involved in muscarinic inhibition of IM with Ca2+ measurement and electrophysiological studies in both neuronal (rat sympathetic neurons) and heterologous (HEK cells expressing KCNQ2/KCNQ3) preparations. We found that muscarinic inhibition of IM was not blocked either by PIP2 or by calphostin C, a PKC inhibitor. We then examined whether muscarinic inhibition of IM uses multiple signaling pathways by blocking both PIP2 depletion and PKC activation. This maneuver, however, did not block muscarinic inhibition of IM. Additionally, muscarinic inhibition of IM was not prevented either by sequestering of G-protein βγ subunits from Gα-transducin or anti-Gβγ antibody or by preventing intracellular trafficking of channel proteins with blebbistatin, a class-II myosin inhibitor. Finally, we re-examined the role of Ca2+ signals in muscarinic inhibition of IM. Ca2+ measurements showed that muscarinic stimulation increased intracellular Ca2+ and was comparable to the Ca2+ mobilizing effect of bradykinin. Accordingly, 20-mM of BAPTA significantly suppressed muscarinic inhibition of IM. In contrast, muscarinic inhibition of IM was completely insensitive to 20-mM EGTA. Taken together, these data suggest a role of Ca2+ signaling in muscarinic modulation of IM. The differential effects of EGTA and BAPTA imply that Ca2+ microdomains or spatially local Ca2+ signals contribute to inhibition of IM.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,General Medicine
Reference76 articles.
1. Aiken SP, Zaczek R, Brown BS (1996) Pharmacology of the neurotransmitter release enhancer linopirdine (DuP 996), and insights into its mechanism of action. Adv Pharmacol 35:349–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60281-1
2. Allbritton NL, Meyer T, Stryer L (1992) Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Science 258(5089):1812–1815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1465619
3. Beech DJ, Bernheim L, Mathie A, Hille B (1991) Intracellular Ca2+ buffers disrupt muscarinic suppression of Ca2+ current and M current in rat sympathetic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88(2):652–656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.2.652
4. Bofill-Cardona E, Vartian N, Nanoff C, Freissmuth M, Boehm S (2000) Two different signaling mechanisms involved in the excitation of rat sympathetic neurons by uridine nucleotides. Mol Pharmacol 57(6):1165–1172
5. Bosma MM, Hille B (1989) Protein kinase C is not necessary for peptide-induced suppression of M current or for desensitization of the peptide receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(8):2943–2947. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.8.2943