Effectiveness of research ethics and integrity competence development – what do learning diaries tell us about learning?

Author:

Tammeleht AnuORCID,Löfström ErikaORCID,Rajando Kertu

Abstract

AbstractDue to the variety of research ethics and integrity training formats it may be challenging to use a common instrument to monitor and evaluate the development of competencies and learning progress as well as determine the effectiveness of the training. The present study scrutinises the use of learning diaries as one possible measure to evaluate the development of ethics competencies. The aim of the study was to increase understanding about how learning diaries capture development of research ethics and integrity competencies of participants and explore the use of diaries as a measure of training effectiveness. In the evaluative case study, a micro-credential programme was used as the context of the study and data was analysed using deductive content analysis. As a result, we outline criteria for analysis to be used in ethics training programmes for learning diaries. Results indicated that learning diaries submitted in the forum format (compared to individual submissions) provide peer support, so learners display more content knowledge on high levels of reflection and understanding. Submitting learning diaries over a longer period and making submissions repeatedly can improve writing and reflection competencies. The quality of learning diary entries may also depend on learner characteristics, such as commitment and motivation. Keeping a learning diary can help retain obtained competencies over a longer period. The article ends with a set of recommendations for implementing learning diaries as one measure of evaluation.

Funder

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme

University of Helsinki

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. ALLEA. 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin. Retrieved from: https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/. Accessed 16th of January 2024.

2. Biggs, John and Cathrine Tang. 2007. Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.) Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

3. Biggs, John, and Kevin Collis. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

4. Cavanagh, Michael. 2011. Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387724.

5. Clarkeburn, Henriikka, J. Roger Downie, and Bob Matthew. 2002. Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education 7 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120100391.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What do we know about the effect of ethics education?;International Journal of Ethics Education;2024-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3