Abstract
AbstractHealth research ethics training is highly variable, with some researchers receiving little to none, which is why ethical frameworks represent critical tools for ethical deliberation and guiding responsible practice. However, these documents' voluntary and abstract nature can leave health researchers seeking more operationalised guidance, such as in the form of checklists, even though this approach does not support reflection on the meaning of principles nor their implications. In search of more reflective and participatory practices in a pandemic context with distance learning, this study explored whether co-design could support engagement and reflection on ethical principles amongst early-stage health researchers. In a pilot test using the Swiss Personalized Health Network's ethical framework for Responsible Usage of Personal Data in Health Research as a case study, we engaged health researchers to design visuals of four ethical principles. In two online workshops, participants (N = 10, N = 8) completed activities such as individual reflection, collaborative ideation, sketching, prototyping, discussion, and feedback. Our analysis shows that the co-design process helped foster in-depth engagement and reflection on the meaning and relevance of the SPHN ethical principles. Participants reported enjoying the experience, and most felt that visuals could motivate engagement with ethical frameworks. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a participatory, design-oriented approach to promote engagement with research ethics among early-career health researchers and highlights key challenges and lessons learned. In doing so, it lays the foundation for future research to investigate the impact of design-oriented, participatory learning to foster reflection and deliberation in ethics education.
Funder
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference48 articles.
1. Beever, J., S.M. Kuebler, and J. Collins. 2021. Where ethics is taught: An institutional epidemiology. International Journal of Ethics Education 6 (2): 215–238.
2. Bijker, W.E. 2003. The need for public intellectuals: A space for STS: Pre-Presidential Address, Annual Meeting 2001, Cambridge, MA. Science, Technology, & Human Values 28 (4): 443–450.
3. Birsel, A. 2017. To come up with a good idea, start by imagining the worst idea possible. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/08/to-come-up-with-a-good-idea-start-by-imagining-the-worst-idea-possible
4. Blasimme, A., M. Fadda, M. Schneider, and E. Vayena. 2018. Data sharing for precision medicine: Policy lessons and future directions. Health Affairs 37 (5): 702–709.
5. Blomkamp, E. 2018. The promise of co-design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (4): 729–743.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献