Fragmented or centralized?: Comparative case study of ethical frameworks for social research in Philippines and Taiwan-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Fragmented or centralized?: Comparative case study of ethical frameworks for social research in Philippines and Taiwan

Published:2022-04-25 Issue:2 Volume:7 Page:235-255
ISSN:2363-9997
Container-title:International Journal of Ethics Education
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Ethics Education

Author:

Bajar Jayson Troy F.^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40889-022-00141-x.pdf

Reference75 articles.

1. Aluwihare-Samaranayake, D. 2012. Ethics in qualitative research: A view of the participants’ and researchers’ world from a critical Standpoint. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11 (2): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100208.

2. Amranova, N. 2019. Unethical experiments’ painful contribution to today’s medicine. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/09/health/unethical-experiments/index.html.

3. Anabo, I. F., I. Elexpuru-Albizuri, and L. Villardón-Gallego. 2019. Revisiting the Belmont Report’s ethical principles in internet-mediated research: Perspectives from disciplinary associations in the social sciences. Ethics and Information Technology 21 (2): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9495-z.

4. AREE. 2021. Our services. https://ethics.moe.edu.tw/intro_en/.

5. Baines, J. T., C. N. Taylor, and F. Vanclay. 2013. Social impact assessment and ethical research principles: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part II. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31 (4): 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.850306.