Abstract
AbstractMoral sensitivity and moral reasoning are essential competencies biomedical researchers have to develop to make ethical decisions in their daily practices. Previous research has shown that these competencies can be developed through ethics education. However, it is unclear which underlying mechanisms best support the development of these competencies. In this article we argue that the development of moral sensitivity and moral reasoning can be fostered through teaching strategies that tap into students’ moral imagination. We describe how moral imagination can stimulate the development of these competencies through three different merits of moral imagination. Moral imagination can help students to 1) transfer and apply abstract moral concepts to concrete situations and contexts, 2) explore the perspective of others, 3) explore and foresee the moral consequences of different decisions and actions. We explain these three merits of moral imagination in the context of biomedical research and present a theoretical model for how these merits can be used to stimulate the development of moral sensitivity and moral reasoning. Furthermore, we describe multiple teaching strategies for biomedical curricula that tap into the three merits of moral imagination. These teaching strategies can inspire teachers to design ethics education that activates students’ moral imagination for the development of moral sensitivity and moral reasoning.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Alexander, T.M. 1993. John Dewey and the moral imagination : Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a postmodern ethics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (3): 369–400.
2. ALLEA 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity; ALLEA—All European Academies: Berlin.
3. Antes, A.L., and J.M. DuBois. 2014. Aligning objectives and assessment in responsible conduct of research instruction. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.852.
4. Antes, A.L., S.T. Murphy, E.P. Waples, M.D. Mumford, R.P. Brown, S. Connelly, and L.D. Devenport. 2009. A Meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19 (5): 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380.
5. Archila, P.A., A.M. Truscott de Mejía, and S. Restrepo. 2022. Using Drama to enrich students’ argumentation about genetically modified foods. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00346-y.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献