A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production

Author:

Wallinga David,Smit Lidwien A. M.,Davis Meghan F.,Casey Joan A.,Nachman Keeve E.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Industrial food animal production accounts for most animal-source protein consumed in the USA. These operations rely on an array of external inputs, which can include antimicrobials of medical importance. The use of these drugs in this context has been the subject of public health debate for decades because their widespread use contributes to the selection for and proliferation of drug-resistant bacteria and their genetic determinants. Here, we describe legislative and regulatory efforts, at different levels of governance in the USA, to curtail food animal consumption of medically important antimicrobials. Recent Findings The features and relative success of the US efforts are examined alongside those of selected member states (Denmark and the Netherlands) of the European Union. Evaluation of efforts at all levels of US governance was complicated by shortcomings in prescribed data collection; nevertheless, available information suggests deficiencies in policy implementation and enforcement compromise the effectiveness of interventions pursued to date. Summary The political will, robust systems for collecting and integrating data on antimicrobial consumption and use, and cross-sectoral collaboration that have been integral to the success of efforts in Denmark and The Netherlands have been notably absent in the USA, especially at the federal level.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation

Reference105 articles.

1. United States Department of Agriculture. 2019. 2017 census of agriculture: summary and state data, volume 1. Geographic area series. Part 51. Available: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf 16 April 2020].

2. Casey JA, Kim BF, Larsen J, Price LB, Nachman KE. Industrial food animal production and community health. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2015;2:259–71.

3. United States Food and Drug Administration. 2013b. Guidance for industy # 213: new animal drugs and new animal drug combination products administered in or on medicated feed or drinking water of foodproducing animals: recommendations for drug sponsors for voluntarily aligning product use conditions with gfi #209 Available: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-213-new-animal-drugs-and-new-animal-drug-combination-products-administered-or-medicated-feed 16 April 2020].

4. United States Food and Drug Administration. 2017a. Potential approach for defining durations of use for medically important antimicrobial drugs intended for use in or on feed: a concept paper. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/144927/download 15 March 2021].

5. Patel SJ, Wellington M, Shah RM, Ferreira MJ. Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities. Clin Ther. 2020;42:1649–58.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3