Author:
Das Darpan,Ahmad Sohail,Kirshner Joshua
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Almost 3 billion people worldwide use solid fuel for cooking and heating. This review examines (i) household energy practices and infrastructures and their influence on fuel usage in different contexts; (ii) barriers in adoption of household clean energy technologies and uses in diverse settings and population groups and (iii) potential air pollution exposure reduction in homes through using processed fuel.
Recent Findings
Population health burden from solid fuel combustion-derived particulate air pollution has been estimated in several low- and middle-income countries. However, such studies have not been carried out in high income countries (e.g., UK). Irrespective of the region, fuel prices are the most dominant factor influencing the choice of fuel. Laboratory studies suggest processed fuel — pellets and briquettes — reduce particulate matter emissions by 70–80% and can be a promising alternative.
Summary
Adoption of clean fuels for domestic energy needs facilitates progress towards five of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There is evidence that a variety of factors, including cost savings, encourage and hinder such uptake. These factors include price fluctuations, expenses, and the usage of clean fuels. Due to their distinct development scenarios, more expansive policy frameworks, and political economies of energy, these determinants are localized in character and differ significantly amongst economies. Therefore, in order to create innovative plans for the adoption of clean fuel use, strategies centred on local settings must be developed while keeping broad socio-technical and socio-economic issues in mind. Solid fuel processing — pelletization and briquetting — have the potential to reach Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)–like emissions, and could be a potential strategy to mitigate exposure to household air pollution
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Desai MA, Mehta S, and Smith KR. Indoor smoke from solid fuels: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. Environ Burd Dis Ser. 2004;(4):82.
2. Shen G, et al. Pollutant emissions from improved coal- and wood-fuelled cookstoves in rural households. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(11):6590–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/es506343z.
3. Yang X, et al. Global burden of lung cancer attributable to ambient fine particulate matter pollution in 204 countries and territories, 1990 – 2019 GBD region. Environ Res. 2022;204(PA):112023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112023.
4. Kar A, Wathor R, Ghosh A, Sharma S, Floess E, Grieshop A, et al. Promoting the use of LPG for household cooking in developing countries, T20 Policy Brief, Available at: https://www.orfonline.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/07/T20_PolicyBrief_TF4_PromotingLPGInTheGlobalSouth.pdf.
5. Smith KR. Fuel combustion, air pollution exposure, and health: the situation in developing countries. Annu Rev energy Environ. 1993;18:529–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.18.110193.002525.