Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is an ongoing need to identify pathologic prognosticators in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) to aid selection of patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic ability of worst pattern of invasion-5 (WPOI-5) defined by the presence of satellite nodules, extratumoural perineural invasion (PNI) and/or extratumoural lymphovascular space invasion (LVI) in low-stage, node negative OCSCC.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of 160 patients with T1/T2N0 tumours staged using TNM7 treated surgically. Histology of the primary tumour was re-reviewed as appropriate to assess for the presence of WPOI-5 parameters. Univariate and multivariate analysis assessing impact of pathological features on survival outcomes was performed.
Results
On univariate analysis, WPOI-5 and its 3 constituent components of satellite nodules, extratumoural PNI and extratumoural LVI were all significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, satellite nodules (odds ratio 6.61, 95% CI 2.83–15.44, p < 0.0001) and extratumoural LVI (odds ratio 9.97, 95% CI 2.19–45.35, p = 0.003) were independently associated with OS. Postoperative radiotherapy (odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.19–0.87, p = 0.02) and non-tongue subsite (odds ratio 3.03, 95% CI 1.70–5.39, p = 0.0002) were also significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Satellite nodules and extratumoural LVI correlated significantly with survival outcomes in our early-stage OSCC cohort. Further study is required to investigate the benefit of adjuvant treatment in these cases and to ascertain if WPOI-5 parameters including satellite nodules should be mandatory reporting data elements.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Otorhinolaryngology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, Sullivan B, Brandwein MS, Ridge JA, Migliacci JC et al (2017) Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. Cancer 67(2):122–137
2. Sessions DG, Spector GJ, Lenox J, Haughey B, Chao C, Marks J (2002) Analysis of treatment results for oral tongue cancer. Laryngoscope 112(4):616–625
3. Ridge JA, Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, Glastonbury CM, Brandwein-Gensler M, Ghossein RA et al (2017) Lip and oral cavity. In: Amin MB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York
4. Yuen AP, Lam KY, Wei WI, Lam KY, Ho CM, Chow TL et al (2000) A comparison of the prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width, thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features of oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg 180(2):139–143
5. Gonzalez-Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Ruiz-Avila I, Gonzalez-Moles S (2002) Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol 38(4):394–397
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献