Abstract
AbstractEthicisation refers to the tendency to frame issues in ethical terms and can be observed in different areas of society, particularly in relation to policy-making on emerging technologies. The turn to ethics implies increased use of ethics expertise, or at least an expectation that this is the case. Calling for experts on ethics when ethically complicated questions need to be handled helps us to uphold central virtues, but there are also problems connected with ethicisation. In policy-making processes, the turn to ethics may not always be a sign of a sincere aspiration to moral performance, but a strategic move to gain acceptance for controversial or sensitive activities, and ethicisation may depoliticise questions and constrain room for democratic participation. Nevertheless, ethicisation, and the ensuing call for ethics experts, suggests an expectation of confidence in ethics and ethics expertise, and that ethical guidance is an effective way of governing people’s behaviour in a morally desirable way. The purpose of this article is to explore democratic and epistemic challenges of ethicisation in the context of emerging technologies, with a specific focus on how the notions of under-reliance and over-reliance of ethics expertise can unpack the processes at play. By using biotechnology and the EU process of bio-patents and the publication of ethical guidelines for AI development as illustrations, it is demonstrated how ethicisation may give rise to democratic and epistemic challenges that are not explicitly addressed in discussions on the political use of ethics expertise.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Algorithm watch. AI ethics guidelines global inventory. https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org.
2. Andersson, Staffan, and Helena Ekelund 2021. Promoting ethics management strategies in the public sector: Rules, values, and inclusion in Sweden. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211050306.
3. AI HLEG. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission: High-Level Expert Group on AI.
4. Barbehön, Marlon, Sybille Münch, and Wolfram Lamping. 2015. Problem definition and agenda-setting in critical perspective. In Handbook of critical policy studies, eds. Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová and Michael Orsini, 241–258.
5. Bogner, Alexander. 2009. Ethisierung und die Marginalisierung der Ethik: Zur Mikropolitik des Wissens in Ethikräten. Soziale Welt 60 (2): 119–137.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献