Naturally and Socially Caused Inequalities: Is the Distinction Relevant for Assessments of Justice?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Naturally and Socially Caused Inequalities: Is the Distinction Relevant for Assessments of Justice?

Published:2020-06-11 Issue:1 Volume:27 Page:95-109
ISSN:1356-4765
Container-title:Res Publica
language:en
Short-container-title:Res Publica

Author:

de los Santos Menéndez Fernando^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Philosophy

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11158-020-09469-x.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Aas, Sean, and David Wasserman. 2016. Natural and social inequality: Disability and fair equality of opportunity. Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (5): 576–601.

2. Arneson, Richard. 1998. What sort of sexual equality should feminists seek? Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 9: 21–36.

3. Brighouse, Harry. 2002. School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Brighouse, Harry, and Adam Swift. 2014. The place of educational equality in educational justice. In Education, justice and the human good: Fairness and equality in the education system, ed. Kirsten Meyer, 14–33. New York: Routledge.

5. Calvert, John. 2015. Luck, choice, and educational equality. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (9): 982–995.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Equality of Opportunity: Pro et Contra;Handbook of Equality of Opportunity;2024

2. Equality of Opportunity: Pro et Contra;Handbook of Equality of Opportunity;2024

3. The trouble with merit;Theory and Research in Education;2022-06-29

4. A Bibliometric Study of Research on Social Responsibility in the Scopus Database;Open Journal of Social Sciences;2022

5. Talents and distributive justice: some tensions;Educational Philosophy and Theory;2020-09-02