Abstract
AbstractDoes domination make us unfree? Republicans argue that it does. Thus, they contend that the liberal conception of freedom is inadequate as it is not (wholly) able to account for domination. I provide a new approach to this controversy. The liberal conception of freedom has the potential to account for domination, but we must adjust the scope of our analysis: claims about domination are best understood not as claims about quantities of liberal freedom, but as claims about the value of liberal freedom. Even if the master is benevolent and indeed does not interfere much with the slave’s choices and actions, the relation of domination affects the quality of the slave’s liberal freedom. To argue for this point, I provide a taxonomy of the value of freedom and then, on this basis, point to several ways in which freedom under domination lacks value.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Binder, Constanze. 2019. Agency, freedom and choice. Springer.
2. Bruin, Boudewijn D. 2009. Liberal and republican freedom. Journal of Political Philosophy 17(4): 418–439.
3. Carter, Ian. 1999. A measure of freedom. OUP.
4. Carter, Ian. 2008. How are power and unfreedom related. In Republicanism and political theory, ed. Cecile Laborde and John W. Maynor, 58–82. Blackwell.
5. Carter, Ian. 2013. Social power and negative freedom. In Power, voting, and voting power: 30 years after, ed. Manfred J. Holler and Hannu Nurmi, 27–62. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.