Abstract
AbstractThis essay asks what it is about the practice of trade that grounds duties of justice between states as trade partners. The answer advanced is that such duties are grounded in the dependence that trade generates. The essay puts forward four conditions that a plausible account of grounding in trade must meet: it must admit of degrees, explain the distinctly international character of trade justice, ground both procedural and distributive duties, and it must be a necessary feature of all trade relationships which generate duties of justice. A dependence account of grounding meets all four conditions, and does so in an intuitively compelling way. While other accounts of what grounds duties of trade justice can meet some of the conditions, none can meet all of them. Relative to rival candidates, then, the dependence account provides a firmer foundation for the ongoing attempts to develop a comprehensive theory of trade justice.
Funder
Royal Institute of Philosophy
University of Leeds
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Abizadeh, Arash. 2007. Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 35(4): 318–358.
2. Baldwin, Robert E. 2012. The Case for a Multilateral Trade Organization. In The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, ed. M. Daunton, A. Narlikar, and R. M. Stern, 29–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barry, Brian. 1982. Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective. Nomos 24: 219–252.
4. Blake, Michael. 2001. Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 30(3): 257–296.
5. Brandi, Clara. 2014. On the Fairness of the Multilateral Trading System. Moral Philosophy and Politics 1(2): 227–247.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Inward internationalisation;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2023-01-21
2. Trade Justice and the Least‐Developed Countries*;Journal of Political Philosophy;2022-03-02