1. S. D. HAITUN, The stationary scientometric distributions. Part I. Different approximations,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 5; Part II. Non-Gaussian nature of scientific activities, Ibid.,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 89; Part III. Role of the Zipf distribution, Ibid.Scientometrics, 4 (1982), 181.
2. See, for example: S. S. STEVENS, Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics, in:Handbook of Experimental Psychology, S. S. STEVENS (Ed.), Wiley, N. Y., 1951, p. 1–49; M REUCHLIN, Measurement in psychology, in:Experimental Psychology. Its Scope and Method, P. FRAISSE, J. PIAGET (Eds), Basic Books, N. Y., 1968, p. 193–237; A. G. AGANBEGIAN, B. N. SHUBKIN, Sotsialniye issledovaniya i kolichestvennye metody (Social investigations and quantitative methods), in:Kolichestvenniye metody v sotsiologii (Quantitative Methods in Sociology), Nauka, Moskva, 1966, p. 5–32; J. PFANZAGL,Theory of Measurement. With cooperation of V. BAUMANN, H. HUBER, 2nd revised ed., Physica-Verlag, Würzburg-Wien, 1971; G. V. OSIPOV, E. P. ANDREEV,Metody izmereniya v sotsiologii (Measurement Methods in Sociology), Nauka, Moskva, 1977.
3. See, for example: S. S. STEVENSop. cit. note 2.
4. “as a matter of fact, most of the scales used widely and effectively by psychologists are ordinal scales” (S. S. STEVENS,op. cit., note 2); “All sociological and social psychological measurements are yet taken on the nominal and ordinal scales... and only timid steps are being taken to make use of more developed scales” (G. V. OSIPOV, E. P. ANDREEV, op. cit., note 2,Metody izmereniya v sotsiologii (Measurement Methods in Sociology), Nauka, Moskva, 1977, p. 65).
5. See, for example: E. LANDAU,Grundlagen der Analysis, Berlin, 1930; S. FEFERMAN,The Number Systems. Foundations of Algebra and Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Pali Alto-London, 1963.