The numbers of fungi: contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding

Author:

Phukhamsakda ChayanardORCID,Nilsson Rolf HenrikORCID,Bhunjun Chitrabhanu S.ORCID,de Farias Antonio Roberto GomesORCID,Sun Ya-Ru,Wijesinghe Subodini N.ORCID,Raza MubasharORCID,Bao Dan-Feng,Lu Li,Tibpromma SaowaluckORCID,Dong Wei,Tennakoon Danushka S.ORCID,Tian Xing-Guo,Xiong Yin-Ru,Karunarathna Samantha C.ORCID,Cai LeiORCID,Luo Zong-LongORCID,Wang Yong,Manawasinghe Ishara S.ORCID,Camporesi ErioORCID,Kirk Paul M.ORCID,Promputtha ItthayakornORCID,Kuo Chang-HsinORCID,Su Hong-Yan,Doilom MingkwanORCID,Li YuORCID,Fu Yong-Ping,Hyde Kevin D.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe global diversity of fungi has been estimated using several different approaches. There is somewhere between 2–11 million estimated species, but the number of formally described taxa is around 150,000, a tiny fraction of the total. In this paper, we examine 12 ascomycete genera as case studies to establish trends in fungal species descriptions, and introduce new species in each genus. To highlight the importance of traditional morpho-molecular methods in publishing new species, we introduce novel taxa in 12 genera that are considered to have low species discovery. We discuss whether the species are likely to be rare or due to a lack of extensive sampling and classification. The genera are Apiospora, Bambusicola, Beltrania, Capronia, Distoseptispora, Endocalyx, Neocatenulostroma, Neodeightonia, Paraconiothyrium, Peroneutypa, Phaeoacremonium and Vanakripa. We discuss host-specificity in selected genera and compare the number of species epithets in each genus with the number of ITS (barcode) sequences deposited in GenBank and UNITE. We furthermore discuss the relationship between the divergence times of these genera with those of their hosts. We hypothesize whether there might be more species in these genera and discuss hosts and habitats that should be investigated for novel species discovery.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Thailand Research Fund

International Cooperation and Exchange Programme

National Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3