Cross-jurisdictional Data Transfer in Health Research: Stakeholder Perceptions on the Role of Law

Author:

Chan Hui YunORCID,Toh Hui Jin,Lysaght Tamra

Abstract

AbstractLarge data-intensive health research programmes benefit from collaboration amongst researchers who may be located in different institutions and international contexts. However, complexities in navigating privacy frameworks and data protection laws across various jurisdictions pose significant challenges to researchers seeking to share or transfer data outside of institutional boundaries. Research on the awareness of data protection and privacy laws amongst stakeholders is limited. Our qualitative study, drawn from a larger project in Singapore, revealed insights into stakeholders’ perceptions of the role of law in cross-national health data research. Stakeholders in our study demonstrated a range of perceptions regarding the role of data protection law in governing the collection and transfer of health data for research. The main criticisms included inadequate legal protection to data and lack of uniformed data protection standards. Despite these criticisms, participants recognised the importance of data protection law in supporting cross-border data transfers and proposed measures to improve perceived limitations of existing laws. These measures include strengthening existing legal framework, establishing contractual agreements and imposing severe punishments for data misuse.

Funder

National Research Foundation Singapore

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference49 articles.

1. APEC. 2005. APEC privacy framework. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooporation,December 2005. https://www.apec.org/publications/2005/12/apec-privacy-framework. Accessed 10 Apr 2023.

2. Ballantyne, Angela, Tamra Lysaght, Hui Jin Toh, Serene Ong, Andrew Lau, G. Owen Schaefer, Vicki Xafis, E Shyong Tai, Ainsley J. Newson, Stacy Carter, Chris Degeling, and Annette Braunack-Mayer. 2022. Sharing precision medicine data with private industry: outcomes of a citizens’ jury in Singapore. Big Data & Society 9: 20539517221108988. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221108988.

3. BSA. 2020. Singapore’s review of the PDPA and its opportunity for leadership in the region. DPO Connect, 31 August 2020. https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/DPO-Connect/August-20/Singapores-Review-of-the-PDPA-and-its-Opportunity-for-Leadership-in-the-Region. Accessed 12 Apr 2023.

4. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

5. European Commission. n.d. Adequacy decision: how the EU determines if a non-EU country has an adequate level of data protection. https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/adequacy-decisions_en#:~:text=The%20European%20Commission%20has%20so,commercial%20organisations%20participating%20in%20the. Accessed 2 Apr 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3