Abstract
AbstractThe genomics community has long acknowledged the lack of diversity in datasets used for research, prompting various stakeholders to confront this issue. In response, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) formulated a policy framework that recognizes the multiplicity of perspectives on diversity and proposed a systemic approach for more optimal data diversity. Given the importance of the research context, assessing this policy’s applicability within countries where diversity is less discussed is important. This study investigated the feasibility of implementing the GA4GH policy in Japan, a nation with a smaller genetic diversity than many Western countries. As the proportion of East Asian genomic research is limited internationally, focusing on the Japanese genome contributes to enhancing diversity. Meanwhile, labelling findings as “Japanese” can inadvertently reinforce perceptions of homogeneity and overlook ethnic minorities. Regions and socioeconomic status are also recognized as substantial factors of diversity within academia, yet concerns persist among the public regarding the heritability of stigmatized conditions. Social inclusion of sexual minorities has begun in Japan, but research surveys generally still use binary sex and gender categories, which underscores the need for additional variables. This study found that both academia and the public need to confront the overemphasis on homogeneity within Japanese society and hesitancy in addressing genetic factors. By doing so, more inclusive and diverse datasets can advance the field both ethically and scientifically. Perhaps the most important impact of the GA4GH policy will be to draw greater attention to the complex diversity challenges ahead in Japan.
Funder
RIKEN
Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo
The University of Tokyo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Ando, Juko. 2023. How is ability inherited: the interplay between nature and nurture. (能力はどのように遺伝するのか 「生まれつき」と「努力」のあいだ) Tokyo: Kodansha.
2. Ballering, Aranka.V., Sarah M Burke, Els L M Maeckelberghe, and Judith G M Rosmalen. 2023. How to ensure inclusivity in large-scale general population cohort studies? Lessons learned with regard to including and assessing sex, gender, and sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior 52: 2163–2172.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02600-y.
3. Blizinsky, K.D., S. Chandrasekharan, S, Jooma, J. A. Reusch, and Kimberly A. Thomson. 2022. Multidirectional genetic and genomic data sharing in the All of Us research program. In Genomic Data Sharing: Case Studies, Challenges, and Opportunities for Precision Medicine, edited by Jennifer B. McCormick and Jyotishman Pathak, 39–69, London: Academic Press.
4. Fatumo, Segun, et al. 2022. A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies. Nature Medicine. 28 (2): 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01672-4.
5. Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. 2024. Considerations for how genetic and genomic researchers should approach thinking about diversity in Data v2.4. https://www.ga4gh.org/document/diversity-in-datasets-policy-v2-4/. Accessed 15 April 2024.