Abstract
AbstractPhysician–patient disputes are a major problem in healthcare. Physician–patient conflicts, workplace violence, and direct involvement in disputes have a significant negative impact on the well-being of physicians. China and Japan have similar cultures but differing healthcare systems. The present study aimed to examine and compare the experiences and perceptions of Chinese and Japanese physicians regarding medical disputes. Qualitative descriptive content analysis was performed for 18 cases from each country to assess the major issues involved in each case and their impact on the physicians. Common issues in medical disputes for both countries included monetary motives of patients and/or families, violence/threats from patients and/or families, the inability of patients and/or families to understand the risk of complications, and the uncertainties of medicine. The serious impact of medical disputes on the mental health and professionalism of physicians was also an issue shared by physicians of both countries. There were, however, differences in the magnitude and frequency of these issues between the two countries. Pre-existing distrust of physicians among patients and/or families was noted only by Chinese physicians, and insufficient information disclosure by physicians was noted only by Japanese physicians. In conclusion, there were similarities and differences between the two countries in the perceptions of physicians regarding medical disputes. Our analysis revealed differing healthcare situations due to cultural and institutional differences as well as universal problems intrinsic to medicine. Based on our results, we propose several key principles to improve the physician–patient relationship.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Asai, Atsushi, Taketoshi Okita, and Seiji Bito. 2022a. Discussions on present Japanese psycho-cultural-social tendencies as obstacles to clinical shared decision-making in Japan. Asian Bioethics Review 14: 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-021-00201-2.
2. Asai, Atsushi, Taketoshi Okita, Masashi Tanaka, Seiji Bito, and Motoki Ohnishi. 2022b. Physician use of the phrase “due to old age” to address complaints of elderly symptoms in Japanese medical settings: The merits and drawbacks. Clinical Ethics 17: 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509211036640(accessdate2024/03/09).
3. Asai, Atsushi, Taketoshi Okita, and Seiji Bito. 2021. A discussion of what patients should be aware of during the shared decision-making process. CBEL Report 2021:4:15–28. (in Japanese) cbel.jp/wp9835259570/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/cbel-report_04_01_02_asai_etal.pdf. Accessd 2024/03/09
4. Ceriani-Cernadas, Jose Maria. 2017. Disclosing errors to patients and parents, and apologizing. Archivos Argentinos De Pediatría 115: 210–221. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2017.eng.210.
5. Chen, Juan, Meng-yun Zhou, Qiao-yong Liu, Lan Ye, Yong-ran Cheng, Ming-we Wang, and Zhan-hui Feng. 2020. High time for ease the doctor-patient relationship on China. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 72:101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101961.