Foreword-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Foreword

Published:2004-01-17 Issue:2-3 Volume:2 Page:93-95
ISSN:1615-6609
Container-title:Poiesis & Praxis
language:en
Short-container-title:Poiesis Prax

Author:

Banta H. David

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,General Engineering

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10202-003-0044-3.pdf

Reference9 articles.

1. Banta HD (Coordinator) (1997) Report from the EUR-ASSESS Project. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 13:131–340

2. Beauchamp T (1994) The ‘four-principles’ approach. In: R Gillon (ed) Principles of health care ethics. Wiley, New York, pp 3–12

3. Cranovsky R, Matillon Y, Banta D (1997) EUR-ASSESS Project subgroup report on coverage. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 13:287–332

4. Daddario E (1967) Technology assessment. In: Statement of the Chairman, subcommittee on science, research and development, to the 90th Congress, 1st session. US Congress, House of Representatives, committee on science and astronautics, Washington DC

5. Engelhard H (1996) The foundations of bioethics. Oxford University Press

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA;Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;2018-04-03

2. Democratic Appraisals of Future Technologies: Integrating Ethics in Technology Assessment;The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology;2016

3. Evaluation of ethical aspects in health technology assessment: more methods than applications?;Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research;2015-01-02

4. INTEGRATING ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: MANY WAYS TO ROME;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care;2015

5. Ethical assessment of new technologies: a meta‐methodology;Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society;2011-03