Assessing the effects of survey-inherent disturbance on primate detectability: Recommendations for line transect distance sampling
Author:
Bessone MattiaORCID, Kühl Hjalmar S., Hohmann Gottfried, Herbinger Ilka, N’Goran K. Paul, Asanzi Papy, Da Costa Pedro B., Dérozier Violette, Fotsing D. B. Ernest, Ikembelo B. Beka, Iyomi D. Mpongo, Iyatshi B. Iyomi, Kafando Pierre, Kambere A. Mbangi, Moundzoho B. Dissondet, Musubaho L. Kako, Fruth Barbara
Abstract
AbstractHabitat destruction and over-hunting are increasingly threatening the arboreal primates of Central Africa. To establish effective conservation strategies, accurate assessments of primate density, abundance, and spatial distribution are required. To date, the method of choice for primate density estimation is line transect distance sampling. However, primates fleeing human observers violate methodological assumptions, biasing the accuracy of resulting estimates. In this study, we used line transect distance sampling to study five primate species along 378 km of transects in Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo. We tested the effect of different levels of survey-inherent disturbance (i.e., cutting) on the number of observed (i) primate groups, and (ii) individuals within groups, by counting groups at three different time lags after disturbance of the transect, (i) a minimum of 3 h, (ii) 24 h, (iii) a minimum of 3 days. We found that survey-inherent disturbance led to underestimated densities, affecting both the number of encountered groups and of observed individuals. However, the response varied between species due to species-specific ecological and behavioral features. Piliocolobus tholloni and Colobus angolenis resumed an unaltered behavior only 24 h after disturbance, while Lophocebus aterrimus, Cercopithecus ascanius, and Cercopithecus wolfi required a minimum of 10 days. To minimize bias in density estimates, future surveys using line transect distance sampling should be designed considering survey-inherent disturbance. We recommend evaluating the factors driving primate response, including habitat type, niche occupation, and hunting pressure, peculiar to the survey-specific area and primate community under study.
Funder
Liverpool John Moores University KfW Entwicklungsbank Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference95 articles.
1. Abernethy K, Maisels F, White LJ (2016) Environmental issues in central Africa. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:1–33 2. Araldi A, Barelli C, Hodges K, Rovero F (2014) Density estimation of the endangered Udzungwa red colobus (Procolobus gordonorum) and other arboreal primates in the Udzungwa Mountains using systematic distance sampling. Int J Primatol 35(5):941–956 3. Bachand N, Arsenault J, Ravel A (2015) Urban household meat consumption patterns in Gabon, Central Africa, with a focus on bushmeat. Hum Dimens Wildl 20(2):147–158 4. Bessone M, Kühl HS, Hohmann G, Herbinger I, N’Goran KP, Asanzi P, Da Costa PB, Dérozier V, Fotsing DBE, Beka BI, Mpongo DI, Iyomi BI, Musubaho LKW, Fruth B (2020) Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera-trap distance sampling. J Appl Ecol 57(5):963–974 5. Bessone M, Bondjengo N, Hausmann A, Herbinger I, Hohmann G, Kuehl H, Mbende M, N'Goran PK, Soliday V, Fruth B (2019) Inventaire de la biodiversité dans le bloc sud du parc national de la Salonga et développement d’une stratégie de suivi écologique pour améliorer la protection de la faune et de la flore menacées dans le parc. Final report. ICCN - WWF - MPI - LMU,
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|