A randomised controlled trial to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a small change approach to prevent weight gain
-
Published:2023-11-06
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0160-7715
-
Container-title:Journal of Behavioral Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Behav Med
Author:
Graham HenriettaORCID, Madigan ClaireORCID, Daley Amanda J.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractA weight gain prevention strategy showing merit is a small change approach (increase energy expenditure and/or decrease energy intake by 100–200 kcal/day). Studies have tested a small change approach in intensive interventions involving multiple contacts, unsuitable for delivery at scale. The aim here was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a remote small change weight gain prevention intervention. A randomised controlled trial of 122 participants was conducted. The intervention was a remote 12-week small change weight gain prevention programme (targeting dietary and/or physical activity behaviours). The comparator group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet. Data were collected at baseline and 12-weeks. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability, assessed against three stop–go traffic light criteria: retention, number of participants randomised per month and adherence to a small change approach. Participants’ opinions of a small change approach and weight change were also measured. The traffic light stop–go criteria results were green for recruitment (122 participants recruited in three months) and retention (91%) and red for intervention adherence. Most participants (62%) found a small change approach helpful for weight management and the mean difference in weight was − 1.1 kg (95% CI − 1.7, − 0.4), favouring the intervention group. Excluding intervention adherence, the trial was feasible and acceptable to participants. Despite adherence being lower than expected, participants found a small change approach useful for weight management and gained less weight than comparators. With refinement to increase intervention adherence, progress to an effectiveness trial is warranted.ISRCTN18309466: 12/04/2022 (retrospectively registered).
Funder
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology
Reference35 articles.
1. Ames, G. E., Heckman, M. G., Diehl, N. N., Grothe, K. B., & Clark, M. M. (2015). Further statistical and clinical validity for the weight efficacy lifestyle questionnaire-short form. Eating Behaviors, 18, 115–119. 2. Ames, G. E., Heckman, M. G., Grothe, K. B., & Clark, M. M. (2012). Eating self-efficacy: Development of a short-form WEL. Eating Behaviors, 13(4), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.03.013 3. Avery, K. N. L., Williamson, P. R., Gamble, C., Francischetto, E. O. C., Metcalfe, C., Davidson, P., et al. (2017). Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: Exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. British Medical Journal Open, 7(2), e013537. 4. Coleman, K. J., Ngor, E., Reynolds, K., Quinn, V. P., Koebnick, C., Young, D. R., Sternfeld, B., & Sallis, R. E. (2012). Initial validation of an exercise “‘vital sign’” in electronic medical records. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(11), 2071–2076. 5. Epstein, L. H., Truesdale, R., Wojcik, A., Paluch, R. A., & Raynor, H. A. (2003). Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food. Physiology & Behavior, 78(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00978-2
|
|