1. Aaron, L. A., Turner, J. A., Mancl, L., Brister, H., & Sawchuk, C. N. (2005). Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: Is reactivity a problem? The Journal of Pain, 6(2), 107–115. doi:
10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.003
2. Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3. Black, A. C., Harel, O., & Matthews, G. (2012). Techniques for analyzing intensive longitudinal data with missing values. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
4. Bowen, J., Gibbons, L., Gianas, A., & Kraft, G. H. (2001). Self-administered expanded disability status scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test. Multiple Sclerosis, 7(3), 201–206.
5. Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., Vikingstad, G., Pribbernow, M., Grossman, S., & Stone, A. A. (2008). The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain, 139(1), 146–157.