Abstract
AbstractMiddle managers are often operating in complex and fast-moving environments, resulting in having to deal with enormous challenges in a short span of time, maneuvering diverse and numerous “givens” and aiming to achieve specific goals. These challenges are very diverse and require support tailored to the needs and characteristics of middle management. Due to the lack of tailored tools, middle managers often use methods that were originally designed for strategic or operational management, which they then adapt as best as possible to fit their tactical management needs. We thus see middle managers as the prototype of managers that have tactical management responsibilities, even though tactical management issues are also faced by executive, operational, and project managers. In a fast-changing world, heavily impacted by globalization and digitization, adaptability is one of the most essential characteristics of a middle manager. However, because of the lack of methods and systems tailored specifically to the tactical management level, middle managers are often not sufficiently supported to be able to deal with numerous givens, unpredictability, and a dynamic, turbulent, and complex environment. Hence, they lack proper support for being adaptable.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference24 articles.
1. Ahmed, H., Naik, G., Willoughby, H., & Edwards, A. G. (2012). Communicating risk. BMJ, 344, e3996.
2. Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595.
3. Boehm, B. W., Gray, T. E., & Seewaldt, T. (1984). Prototyping versus specifying a multi-project experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE 10(3), 290–303 [139].
4. Carrizo, D., & Quintanilla, I. (2018, March). Prototyping use as a software requirements elicitation technique: A case study. In: World conference on information systems and technologies (pp. 341–350). Cham: Springer.
5. Cheverst, K., Mitchell, K., & Davies, N. (2002). Investigating context-aware information push vs. information pull to tourists. Proceedings of Mobile HCI, 1(1).