Author:
Armatas Christopher A.,Borrie William T.,Watson Alan E.
Abstract
Significance StatementNatural resource planners face the challenging task of sustaining the diverse range of human-nature relationships supported by mountain systems. Planners of the Flathead Wild and Scenic River system cannot reasonably consider and communicate each individual human-nature relationship in the planning process. We present a social science approach that facilitates public engagement by having members of the interested public prioritize human and ecological meanings and services. Statistical analysis distills the diverse range of human-nature relationships into a limited number to be considered by river planners. Six typified human-nature relationships are explored, and through an understanding of synergies and tensions, planners gain knowledge to support both decision-making and communication for sustaining the integrated mountain system.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference27 articles.
1. Aadland, C., & Dietrich, E.. (2020). CSKT water compact clears congress. Montana Free Press, December 22. https://montanafreepress.org/2020/12/22/cskt-water-compact-clears-congress/
2. Armatas, C. A. (2019). Pragmatist ecological economics: Focusing on human-nature relationships and social-ecological systems (dissertation). In Department of Society and Conservation. The University of Montana. http://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1025/
3. Armatas, C. A., Borrie, W. T., & Watson, A. E. (2019). Protocol for social vulnerability assessment to support National Forest Planning and management: A technical manual for engaging the public to understand ecosystem service tradeoffs and drivers of change. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-396. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. Available at URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/59038
4. Armatas, C. A., Venn, T. J., & Watson, A. E. (2017). Understanding social–ecological vulnerability with Q-methodology: A case study of water-based ecosystem services in Wyoming, USA. Sustainability Science, 12(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0369-1
5. Armatas, C. A., Watson, A. E., & Borrie, W. T. (2021). Flathead wild and Scenic River planning: 2019 Q-methodology data on public perspectives of human and ecological meanings and services and drivers of change. Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2021-0025