Mimetic Challenges of Learning to Be a Democratic Citizen

Author:

Huhtala Hanna-Maija

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of mimesis can be utilized in educational theorizations of democratic citizenship and in fleshing out learning paths related to citizenship. It offers the possibility to examine citizenship from the viewpoint of an informal way of learning that is, at times, unconscious, and even accidental, and which can lead to unwanted outcomes. Such characteristics of learning are inescapable for human beings and, thus, hold crucial importance for education for democratic citizenship. Drawing on the theory of mimesis, the chapter argues for the importance of acknowledging the mimetic power of emotions. It employs particularly Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer’s account of mimesis in which mimesis is both a possibility and a threat. However, according to them, the modern individual has a strong tendency toward unfavourable mimesis due to an unbalanced human-nature relationship. The overall purpose is to examine how the notion of mimesis can contribute to education for democracy.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference65 articles.

1. Adorno, T. W. (1967). Aspekte des neuen Rechts-radikalismus Österreichische Mediathek. Audio file. https://www.mediathek.at/atom/014EEA8D-336-0005D-00000D5C-014E5066. Accessed 7 April 2021.

2. Adorno, T. W. (2000). Problems of moral philosophy (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Polity Press. Original edition: Adorno, T. W. (1963). Probleme der Moralphilosophie. Suhrkamp Verlag.

3. Adorno, T. W. (2005). Critical models: Interventions and catchwords (H. W. Pickford, Trans.). Columbia University Press. Original editions: Adorno, T. W. (1963). Eingriffe: Neun kritische Modelle. Suhrkamp Verlag, and Adorno, T. W. (1969). Stichworte: Kritische Modelle 2. Suhrkamp Verlag.

4. Adorno, T. W. (2020). Aspects of the new right-wing extremism (W. Hoban, Trans.). Polity Press. Original edition: Adorno, T. W. (2020). Aspekte des neuen Rechtsradikalismus. Suhrkamp Verlag.

5. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragment (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Standford University Press. Original edition: Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Querido Verlag.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3