Author:
Masuda Yuta J.,Robinson Brian E.,Holland Margaret B.,Tseng Tzu-Wei Joy,Frechette Alain
Abstract
AbstractAs research and policies around securing tenure for people across the world grows, we have a deeper understanding of what works and what does not. Here, we draw attention to contemporary evidence gaps that continue to hinder efforts to strengthen land tenure security (LTS) for sustainable development. We also highlight areas ripe for policy testing and innovation and discuss promising pathways for advancing research and practice for LTS.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference30 articles.
1. Adam, A. G. (2020). Understanding competing and conflicting interests for peri-urban land in Ethiopia’s era of urbanization. Environment and Urbanization, 32(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819890215
2. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2000). Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 389–430. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554809
3. Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction (Vol. 7). World Bank Policy Research Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0213-8
4. Deininger, K., Ali, D. A., & Alemu, T. (2011). Impacts of land certification on tenure security, investment, and land market participation: Evidence from Ethiopia. Land Economics, 87(2), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.87.2.312
5. Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E., Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M., Agard Trinidad, J., et al. (2019). IPBES, summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.