Author:
Sauerwein Markus,Theis Désirée
Abstract
AbstractIn educational research, comparisons are often made of groups or of the development of various (latent) constructs over time (e.g. teaching quality in different countries or different groups’ (girls vs. boys) perceptions of teaching quality). However, before the results of such comparisons can be accurately interpreted, measurement invariance (MI) of the constructs under investigation needs to be established to ensure their meaning remains consistent across groups, subjects, or assessment points. Thus, if mean level changes are to be compared between groups, scalar factorial invariance needs to be established. In this chapter, we investigate and discuss how results of MI analyses should be interpreted and whether they should be reported on with regard to contents. Using data from the well-known Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) study on teaching quality, we introduce an approach to examining the conditions under which comparison among cultural groups is possible even if MI is lacking.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference65 articles.
1. Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105275904
2. Bohnsack, R. (1991). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitativer Forschung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
3. Borsboom, D. (2006). When does measurement invariance matter? Medical Care, 44(Suppl 3), S176–S181. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245143.08679.cc
4. Breakspear, S. (2012). The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance (OECD Publishing, Ed.) (OECD Education Working Papers no. 71).
5. Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献