Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter, I engage with the work of political theorist Chantal Mouffe that puts forward a malleable and relational understanding of identity beyond simple demographic categories—specifically her account of how political identities are contingently formed through processes of ‘identification’ and ‘antagonism’. Bringing in illustrative vignettes from discussions in a teacher education classroom, as well as some recent neuroscience research, I gesture towards the power of identification and antagonism in fomenting confidence and collective resolve. I also draw from those discussions and sources to raise questions about the potential hazards with such collective identification and antagonism, especially those of us who are committed to education—even of ‘them’ whom ‘we’ are utterly opposed.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference46 articles.
1. Appiah, K. A. (2018). The lies that bind: Rethinking identity. Profile Books.
2. Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made. Pan Books.
3. Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., Hollander, E., Ludwig, N. N., Kolevzon, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Oxytocin selectively improves empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1426–1428.
4. Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639–650.
5. Bethlehem, R. A., Baron-Cohen, S., van Honk, J., Auyeung, B., & Bos, P. A. (2014). The oxytocin paradox. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(48), 1–5.