A Story Too Good to Be True: The Manipulation of Truth Claims in Faked News

Author:

Schirrmacher Beate

Abstract

AbstractIn 2018, former German star reporter Claas Relotius admitted that he manipulated most of his prize-winning feature stories. Why did no one suspect for a long time that his stories were a bit too good to be true? Instead of trying to differentiate facts from fiction, this article explores how facts and narrative interact in journalism. Drawing on Lars Elleström’s approach to how truthfulness in communication is based on indexicality (Semiotica 225, 423–446, 2018), the analysis looks for indexical traces of journalistic work in two news features published in Der Spiegel, one by Alexander Osang (Der Spiegel 37, 50–54, 2018) and the manipulated feature, “The story of Ahmed and Alin” by Claas Relotius (Der Spiegel 28, 127–34, 2016). The analysis explores how observed and verifiable details interact with elements of internal and external coherence. In Osang’s feature, the different indexical relationships are closely connected yet clearly separated. In Relotius’s manipulated feature, the different indexical relationships are not easily identified, and elements of coherence point towards each other instead of being grounded in observed and verifiable detail. This kind of analysis makes it possible to start to describe in more detail how a factual narrative is truthfully or only insufficiently grounded in actual events.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference36 articles.

1. Aare, C. (2021). Reportaget som berättelse: En narratologisk undersökning av reportagegenren. Stockholms Universitet.

2. Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. Continuum.

3. Bietz, C. (2013). Die Geschichten der Nachrichten: Eine narratologische Analyse telemedialer Wirklichkeitskonstruktion. WTB.

4. Björninen, S. (2019). The rhetoric of factuality in narrative: Appeals to authority in Claas Relotius’s feature journalism. Narrative Inquiry, 29, 352–370.

5. Borčak, F. (2016). A Children’s literature? Subversive Infantilisation in contemporary Bosnian-Herzegovinian fiction. Linnaeus University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3