Abstract
AbstractEducation is haunted by a dogmatic image of thought that sees learning as outcomes, representations, and a thing to be tested. The problematic of the dogmatic image of thought reactualizes in science education, where discursive systems and propositions counteract a fresh image of thought in terms of flows. In physics education, the dogmatic image of thought obfuscates seeing functives as multiplicities and posits physics education as the learning of stable singular concepts rather than functives. The first example drawn upon, utilizing Richard Feynman’s lecture, is the theory of gravity, presented here not as a concept, but as a complex function composed of functives. The second example is Pierre-Simon Laplace’s writings on probability and determinism. Both historical cases display the issues regarding the dogmatic image of thought and the fulcrum to revisit it as bodily flows. The last point raised in this chapter is how learning about the world, when seen as a flow, is connected to a double activity of thought and body, drawing extensively on Spinoza’s epistemology and Deleuze’s interpretation of it.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference26 articles.
1. Bang, L. (2017). In the maw of the Ouroboros: An analysis of scientific literacy and democracy. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 13, 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9808-2
2. Bang, L. (2018). The inquiry of Cyclops: Dewey’s scientific inquiry revisited. In K. Otrel-Cass, M. K. Sillasen, & A. A. Orlander (Eds.), Cultural, social and political perspectives in science education (Vol. 15, pp. 49–69). Springer.
3. Bang, L., & Valero, P. (2014). Chasing the chimera’s tails: An analysis of interest in science. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The ‘reason’ of schooling: Historizing curriculum studies, pedagogy and teacher education. Routledge.
4. Bazzul, J., Wallace, M. F., & Higgins, M. (2018). Dreaming and immanence: Rejecting the dogmatic image of thought in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(3), 823–835.
5. Colebrook, C. (2016). ‘A grandiose time of coexistence’: Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 440–454.