Author:
Rahman Andaleeb,Pingali Prabhu
Abstract
AbstractIndian social welfare policy has traditionally considered poverty to be synonymous with hunger and famines in rural areas. Ongoing changes in the demographic and economic structure of the country, however, require a reorientation of anti-poverty policies toward the various emerging sources of poverty and vulnerability to foster a resilient development process. In this chapter, we identify the following key aspects of livelihood risks in the wake of India’s stunted structural transformation—smaller landholding size, low skill levels among workers, the dominance of informal employment, the slow pace of urbanization, and an aging population. We further suggest ways to adapt to these changing economic realities.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference83 articles.
1. Abraham, Rosa. 2019. “Informal Employment and the Structure of Wages in India: A Review of Trends.” Review of Income and Wealth 65 (S1): S102–S122. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12435.
2. Afridi, Farzana, Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, and Soham Sahoo. 2016. “Female Labor Force Participation and Child Education in India: Evidence from the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.” IZA Journal of Labor & Development 5, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40175-016-0053-y.
3. Aiyar, Yamini, and Salimah Samji. 2009. “Transparency and Accountability in NREGA: A Case Study of Andhra Pradesh.” AI Working Paper No. 1, February, Accountability Initiative, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi.
4. Asri, Viola. 2019. “Targeting of Social Transfers: Are India’s Poor Older People Left Behind?” World Development 115: 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.001.
5. Azam, Mehtabul. 2012. “The Impact of Indian Job Guarantee Scheme on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6548, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.