1. Aletras N et al (2016) Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput Sci 2(2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93
2. Barabas C et al (2018) Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment. Available via Cornell University. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08238
3. Council of Europe Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) (2020) Feasibility Study on AI Legal Standards. https://rm.coe.int/cahai-2020-23-final-eng-feasibility-study-/1680a0c6da
4. Council of Europe European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2018) European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment
5. Council of Europe European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2020) Possible introduction of a mechanism for certifying artificial intelligence tools and services in the sphere of justice and the judiciary: Feasibility Study. https://rm.coe.int/feasability-study-en-cepej-2020-15/1680a0adf4