Science as a Lever: The Roles and Power of Civil Society Organisations in Citizen Science

Author:

Göbel Claudia,Ottolini Lucile,Schulze Annett

Abstract

AbstractCitizen science has become an umbrella term that encompasses a growing range of activities, actors, and issues. This chapter examines the potential of citizen science to generate transformative knowledge and argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) are key actors in this regard. However, the roles of CSOs are neglected in the literature on citizen science. We turn to the traditions of community-based research and participatory action research to learn more. With two case studies on health and safety, we show how transformative knowledge enables concerned communities to claim their rights and enriches scientific knowledge generation. Through a socio-historical analysis, we find three main roles grassroots CSOs take on in participatory research: (1) a technical role in the production of data and knowledge; (2) a governance role in the deliberation on research activities and risk assessment; and (3) an advocacy role by campaigning for transformative knowledge. These roles determine the ability of grassroots CSOs to generate legitimacy and rely on CSO members belonging to different spheres of society, scientific skills, and access to marginalised communities. Finally, we discuss the conceptual and practical challenges of accounting for CSOs’ roles in order to build a more just and transformative future through citizen science.

Funder

European Commission 2020 COST

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference44 articles.

1. ALLISS (Alliance Sciences Sociétés). (2017). Livre Blanc Prendre au sérieux la société de connaissance. Resource document. INRA Science & Impact. https://inra-dam-front-resources-cdn.wedia-group.com/ressources/afile/397900-528c0-resource-livre-blanc-alliss-prendre-au-serieux-la-societe-de-la-connaissance.pdf

2. Barbier, L. (2019). Une entreprise inaccessible? Faire la preuve des pathologies environnementales par l’épidémiologie: L’exemple du nucléaire en Grande-Bretagne et en France (Thèse en Sociologie). Bibliothèque de l’Université de Paris.

3. Berrino, F., & Morosini, P. L. (1977). Soggettivitá del gruppo omogeneo e ricerca epidemiologica. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 1, 21–23.

4. Calavita, K. (1986). Worker safety, law, and social change: The Italian case. Law & Society Review, 20(2), 189–228.

5. Callon, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2008). The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 230–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311264.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3