How Can Policy Theory Help to Address the Expectations Gap in Preventive Public Health and ‘Health in All Policies’?
Author:
Cairney Paul,Denny Emily St.,Mitchell Heather
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter explores how to combine insights from public health and political science to explain and adapt to policymaking in preventive public health. First, it describes public health approaches to policy change, focusing on the social determinants of health and the need for high political commitment to health equity. Second, it suggests that, while governments often use the right language to describe public health aims, there is a major gap between commitment, policy, and policy outcomes. We draw on public policy theories to explain this gap, with reference to the ambiguity of preventive policy initiatives, exacerbated by policymaking complexity in which no actor or organisation has strong coordinative capacity. Third, it relates these insights to a qualitative systematic review of ‘Health in All Policies’ (HiAP) research. We compare two different ways to use policy theories for practical lessons: to improve the HiAP playbook and programme logic or to prompt critical reflection on policymaking dilemmas.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference75 articles.
1. Baum, F., Lawless, A., Delany, T., Macdougall, C., Williams, C., Broderick, D., Wildgoose, D., Harris, E., Mcdermott, D., Kickbusch, I., & Popay, J. (2014). Evaluation of health in all policies: Concept, theory and application. Health Promotion International, 29(Suppl_1), i130–i142. 2. Baum, F., Townsend, B., Fisher, M., Browne-Yung, K., Freeman, T., Ziersch, A., Harris, P., & Friel, S. (2020). Creating political will for action on health equity: Practical lessons for public health policy actors. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.233 3. Baumgartner, F., Jones, B., & Mortensen, P. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium theory. In C. Weible & P. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Westview. 4. Bevir, M. (2013). A theory of governance. Gaia Books. 5. Boswell, J., & Corbett, J. (2015). Stoic democrats? Anti-politics, élite cynicism and the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1388–1405.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review;Canadian Journal of Public Health;2023-03-21 2. Conclusion;Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe;2022-08-25 3. Strategies to Reduce Gender Inequalities;Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe;2022-08-25 4. Strategies to Reduce Inequalities in Education;Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe;2022-08-25 5. Strategies to Reduce Health Inequalities;Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe;2022-08-25
|
|