Author:
Awad Ahmed S.,Patel Kinjal M.,Desai Ronak G.,Mitrev Ludmil
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference37 articles.
1. Attia RQ, Hickey GL, Grant SW, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched study from the UK national data. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000236.
2. Yamada T, Ochiai R, Takeda J, Shin H, Yozu R. Comparison of early postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive versus conventional valve surgery. J Anesth. 2003;17(3):171–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-003-0176-6.
3. Grossi EA, Zakow PK, Ribakove G, et al. Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16(Suppl 2):S39–42.
4. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(6):455–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053.
5. STS National Database Spring 2003. Executive summary. Durham, NC: Duke Clinical Research Institute; 2003.