Abstract
AbstractThis chapter contributes with a novel analysis of how non-affirmative theory of education and Bildung contribute to the development of a second generation of school didactics (Uljens, School didactics and learning. Psychology Press, Hove, 1997). Despite differences in terminology, non-affirmative general pedagogy and school didactics have similarities. First, inspired by the early reception Hegel-influenced education theorizing in Finland (J. V. Snellman, Z. J. Cleve), school didactics (SD) focuse the relational teaching-studying-learning process, which resembles the constitutive principles of summoning and Bildsamkeit. Second, both are Bildung-centred regarding the centrality and the educative treatment of teaching contents from the learner’s perspective. Third, despite one is centered on general pedagogy (‘Allgemeine Pädagogik’) and the other on didactics, both focus the school as an educative institution. Fourth, both focus how societal interests transform into and influence pedagogical interaction. Fifth, both accept a non-teleological view of societal development. Sixth, both positions accept critical citizenship (Mündigkeit) and democracy as central for public education. Yet, the chapter shows how the principles put forth in non-affirmative general pedagogy significantly deepens many themes in the early version of school didactics. The present version of school didactics makes a contribution by identifying three related pairs of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, and explains the transition between these by the principles of summoning to self-activity and Bildsamkeit. Non-affirmative SD also reminds that educational leadership is necessary for understanding school teaching.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference93 articles.
1. Arnold, K. H. (2012). Didactics, didactic models and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1833
2. Benner, D. (2015). Allgemeine Pädagogik (8th ed.). Beltz Juventa.
3. Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford University Press.
4. Biesta, G. (2019). Obstinate education. Reconnecting school and society. Brill.
5. Breazeale, D., & Rockmore, T. (Eds.). (1996). New perspectives on Fichte. Humanity Books.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献