Abstract
AbstractPrevious chapters of this book demonstrate that a cohesive and well-supported conceptual site model (CSM) of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) petroleum is commonly the cornerstone of successful risk analysis and/or remediation design. It is difficult to overstate however, the extent to which the heterogeneity of source term NAPL distribution confounds one’s efforts to develop an accurate NAPL CSM. In most cases, only near-continuous measurements of NAPL in the soil are capable of adequately conceptualizing a site’s complex NAPL distribution. Continuous NAPL logging, conducted at a significant number of locations across a petroleum release site, is necessary to better comprehend the chaotic nature of the NAPL’s distribution. Applying high-resolution screening techniques sitewide is known as high-resolution site characterization (HRSC) and this chapter describes how the most commonly applied HRSC techniques can make the difficult task of logging continuously for petroleum NAPL, and its associated groundwater impacts, not only possible but fairly routine.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference54 articles.
1. Adamson DT, Chapman S, Mahler N, Newell C, Parker B, Pitkin S, Rossi M, Singletary M (2014) Membrane interface probe protocol for contaminants in low-permeability zones. Groundwater 52:550–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12085
2. Alostaz MD, Biggar K, Donahue R, Hall G (2008) Soil type effects on petroleum contamination characterization using ultraviolet induced fluorescence excitation-emission matrices (EEMs) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). J Environ Eng Sci 7(6):661–675. https://doi.org/10.1139/S08-037
3. Apitz SE, Borbridge LM, Bracchi K, Lieberman SH (1992) The fluorescent response of fuels in soils: insights into fuel-soil interactions. SPIE Int Soc Opt Photonics 1716:139–147
4. Berlman IB (1965) Handbook of fluorescence spectra of aromatic molecules. Academic Press Inc., New York
5. Brooks MC, Yarney E, Huang J (2020) Strategies for managing risk due to back diffusion. Ground Water Monit Remediat 41(1):76–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12423