1. American Psychological Association. (2013). Policy related to psychologists’ work in national security settings and reaffirmation of the APA position against torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. Retrieved from
http://www.apa.org/about/policy/national-security.aspx
2. Best, J. (2001). Social progress and social problems: Toward a sociology of gloom. The Sociological Quarterly, 42, 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2001.tb02372.x
3. Coalition for an Ethical Psychology. (2011). Background statement on annulment of the APA’s PENS report. Retrieved from
http://www.ethicalpsychology.org/materials/PENS_Annulment_Background_Statement.pdf
4. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Hoffman, D. H., Carter, D. J., Lopez, C. R. V., Benzmiller, H. L., Guo, A. X., Latifi, S. Y., & Craig, D. C. (2015, July 2). Report to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association: Independent review relating to APA ethics guidelines, national security interrogations, and torture. Chicago, IL: Sidley Austin LLP. Retrieved from
http://www.apa.org/independent-review/APA-FINAL-Report-7.2.15.pdf