Author:
Shepherd Dean A.,Parida Vinit,Wincent Joakim
Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter—“An Entrepreneurial Process for Exploiting Vulnerable People’s Labor”—we take an even bigger step toward the dark side of entrepreneurial action in response to chronic adversity. In this chapter, we take the perspective of victims to explore a destructive entrepreneurial process that involves multiple actors—namely, that of exploiting vulnerable women and girls for human trafficking. We focus on the destructive entrepreneurial practices used to exploit vulnerable individuals for their labor to explain how entrepreneurs (as actors within the human-trafficking system) methodically target impoverished women and girls and transform their autonomous objections into unquestioned compliance. We show that through the entrepreneurial practices of (1) deceptive recruiting of the vulnerable, (2) entrapping through isolation, (3) extinguishing alternatives by building barriers, and (4) converting the exploited into exploiters, these entrepreneurs diminish and eventually eliminate vulnerable workers’ autonomy. In doing so, we shed light on the illegal entrepreneurial process of exploiting vulnerable individuals’ labor and ruining their lives by eliminating their free will.
Funder
Luleå University of Technology
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference58 articles.
1. Albanese, J. (2007). A criminal network approach to understanding and measuring trafficking in human beings. In E. U. Savona & S. Stefanizzi (Eds.), Measuring human trafficking (pp. 55–71). Springer.
2. Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). How can you do it? Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review,24(3), 413–434.
3. Baker, L. M., Dalla, R. L., & Williamson, C. (2010). Exiting prostitution: An integrated model. Violence Against Women,16(5), 579–600.
4. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist,44(9), 1175–1184.
5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,52(1), 1–26.