Abstract
AbstractIn 1982, the artist Agnes Denes and several volunteers grew two acres of wheat near Manhattan’s financial district, titling the project Wheatfield: A Confrontation. Denes had undeniably eco-ethical intentions, and her work was celebrated as environmentalist. But did Wheatfield’s pastoral aesthetic confront the capitalist power structures Denes hoped to critique or offer urban elites a picturesque spectacle? The notion of hinterland—literally, land behind a city that provides natural resources and labor power—guides this chapter’s inquiry into ideas and ideologies that lay behind Wheatfield. As the climate emergency exacerbates polarizations between urban and rural contexts, studying Wheatfield yields important clues for how contemporary ecopolitical art might disrupt ecologically and socially unjust systems, cultivate alternatives, and avoid compromise, complicity, or appropriation.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference34 articles.
1. “Agnes Denes.” 1982. Agnes Denes. http://www.agnesdenesstudio.com/works7.html.
2. Aronczyk, Melissa. 2021. Spin Doctors Have Shaped the Environmentalism Debate for Decades. The Washington Post, February 21.
3. Berger, John. 2008. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Classics.
4. Brenner, Neil. 2016. The Hinterland Urbanised? Architectural Design 86 (4): 118–127.
5. Brenner, Neil, and Nikos Katsikis. 2020. Operational Landscapes: Hinterlands of the Capitalocene. Architectural Design 90 (1): 22–31.