1. Adler, J., Yang, Y., Borko, H., Krainer, K., & Patahuddin, S. (2017). Topic Study Group No. 50: In-service education, and professional development of secondary mathematics teachers. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education—ICME-13 (pp. 609–612). Cham: Springer.
2. Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
4. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classrooms and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). New York, NY: Springer.
5. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.