The Role of Peer Review in the Scientific Process-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Role of Peer Review in the Scientific Process

Published:2022 Issue: Volume: Page:409-416
ISSN:
Container-title:Integrity of Scientific Research
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

De La Garza Henriette,Vashi Neelam A.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_41

Reference34 articles.

1. Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K (2014) Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, & a survival guide. EJIFCC 25(3):227–243

2. Rockwell S (2014) Ethics of peer review: a guide for manuscript reviewers case studies - guide for the discussion leader. Office, pp 1–19

3. Wiley RANO Survey (2013) Principles of peer review. Wiley Author Services. https://authorservices.wiley.com/asset/Principles_of_Peer_Review.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2021

4. Elsevier, The Publishing Research Consortium (PRC) Survey (2016) How researchers really feel about peer review. Elsevier, Amsterdam. elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/205717/PeerReviewWeek2016_Infographic.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2021

5. Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F (2002) Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 287(21):2784–2786

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Creating diverse and inclusive scientific practices for research datasets and dissemination;Imaging Neuroscience;2024

2. Cobblers, Let’s Stick to Our Lasts! A Song of Sorrow (and of Hope) About the State of Personnel and Human Resource Management Science;Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management;2023-09-07