1. Alani, H., Harris, S., O’Neil, B.: Winnowing ontologies based on application use. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 185–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_16. ISBN 978-3-540-34545-9
2. Androutsopoulos, I., Lampouras, G., Galanis, D.: Generating natural language descriptions from OWL ontologies: the naturalowl system. CoRR, abs/1405.6164 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.6164
3. Cregan,A., Schwitter, R., Meyer, T.: Sydney OWL syntax - towards a controlled natural language syntax for OWL 1.1. In: Golbreich, C., Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B. (eds.) OWLED, vol. 258 (2007)
4. Dentler, K., Cornet, R.: Intra-axiom redundancies in SNOMED CT. Artif. Intell. Med. 65(1), 29–34 (2015). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/artmed/artmed65.html#DentlerC15
5. Venugopal, V.E., Kumar, P.S.: Difficulty-level modeling of ontology-based factual questions. Semant. Web 11(6), 1023–1036 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200381