Responsibility in Road Traffic-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Responsibility in Road Traffic

Published:2022 Issue: Volume: Page:1-27
ISSN:
Container-title:The Vision Zero Handbook
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hansson Sven Ove

Abstract

AbstractVision Zero requires a new approach to the responsibility for safety. This chapter provides conceptual tools for the description and analysis of this and other responsibility issues. Distinctions between different types of responsibility are introduced, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between blame responsibility and task responsibility. The complex relationship between responsibility and causality is also delineated. This is followed by an analysis of the changes in responsibility assignments that are necessary to implement Visio Zero.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_5-1

Reference75 articles.

1. Abebe, H. G., Edvardsson Björnberg, K., & Hansson, S. O. (2022). Arguments against Vision Zero: A literature review. This volume.

2. Algora-Buenafé, A. F., Suasnavas-Bermúdez, P. R., Merino-Salazar, P., & Gómez-García, A. R. (2017). Epidemiological study of fatal road traffic accidents in Ecuador. The Australasian Medical Journal, 10(3), 238–245.

3. American Medical Association. (2019). Code of Medical Ethics opinion 9.7.3. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/capital-punishment. Downloaded 28 July 2020.

4. Anon. (2005). Medical collusion in the death penalty: An American atrocity [editorial]. Lancet, 365, 1361–1361.

5. Anon. (2013). Transport safety award open for entries. https://cvshow.com/transport-safety-award-open-for-entries/. Downloaded 23 Feb 2020.