Towards Place-Sensitive Crisis Management? Pandemic Policies in Five Nordic Countries

Author:

Baldersheim Harald,Haug Are Vegard

Abstract

AbstractThe policy issue in focus in this chapter is the local implementation of covid management policies during the pandemic 2020–2022 in the five Nordic countries. More specifically, we seek to determine the extent to which national policies were shaped and implemented in ways that took account of variations in local contexts, such as, for example, varying levels of contagion, different demographic structures, economic needs, access to medical treatment, et cetera. The analysis is based on data on how 411 mayors experienced the Covid policies of the Nordic countries and thus presents a bottom-up perspective on IGR in times of uncertainty and turbulence. The main hypothesis is that the mayors’ experiences of IGR significantly depend upon their access to national levels of decision-making. The hypothesis was largely confirmed, but the analysis also demonstrated that a series of other factors influenced IGRs as experienced by mayors, such as political affiliation or centre–periphery contrasts, while formal institutional variations did not matter as much as expected.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference28 articles.

1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008, October). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

2. Baldersheim, H., Rose, L. E., & Sandberg, S. (2017). Cooperative decentralisation. Local and regional government in the Nordic countries. In O. Knutsen (Ed.), The Nordic models in political science. Challenged, but still viable? (2nd ed.). Fagbokforlaget.

3. Bassan, S. (2021). A proportionality-based framework for government regulation of digital tracing apps in times of emergency. Dickinson L. Rev., 126, 361.

4. Behnke, N., & Person, C. (2022). Fôderalismus in der krise – Restriktiviätet under Variation in der Infektionsshutzverordnungen der Länder. Der Moderne Staat, 15(1), 62–83.

5. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3