Author:
Kori Dumisani Shoko,Francis Joseph,Zuwarimwe Jethro
Abstract
AbstractMaize farming in resettlement areas of Chirumanzu District of Zimbabwe is vulnerable to climatic variations. The Government of Zimbabwe encourages maize farmers in resettlement areas to adapt to climate variability through conservation farming and diversification among other measures. It is envisaged that the measures will improve maize farmers’ resilience and ability to safeguard food and nutrition security in the country. However, the process of adaptation is dynamic, complex, and multifaceted in nature. Several problems and dangers accompany the process of adaptation. The problems and dangers are associated with intangible and indirect costs. The focus of this chapter is to explore intangible and indirect costs associated with measures adopted by maize farmers in resettlement areas of Chirumanzu in Zimbabwe. Fifty-four maize farmers from four resettlement wards provided the data through semi-structured interviews. Diversification, changing planting dates, use of drought tolerant varieties were some of the measures adopted. Several problems and dangers accompanied the adaptation measures adopted. Intangible costs such as pain and suffering, embarrassment, ridicule, and stereotyping were experienced. Indirect costs including additional and unplanned costs were also encountered. This chapter concludes that intangible and indirect costs associated with adaptation may result in reduced adaptive capacity and resilience of maize farmers. Therefore, national governments should exercise extreme caution and desist from only encouraging farmers to adapt. Rather, they should consider intangible and indirect costs involved while providing solutions to reduce them to avoid situations where farmers are worse off while facilitating sustainable adaptation.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference70 articles.
1. Adam B, Wiredu AN (2015) Cost benefit analysis of climate change adaptation measures on soil and water conservation in Northern Ghana (eds: Ministry of Food and Agriculture GUOH, Institute of Farm Management (Germany)). Csir-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Ghana. Online, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Republic of Ghana
2. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354
3. Adger W, Tara Q, Lorenzoni I, Murphy C, Sweeney J (2013) Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3:330–333
4. Agrawala S, Crick F, Jette-Nantel S, Tepes A (2008) Empirical estimates of adaptation costs and benefits: a critical assessment. In: Agrawala S, Fankhauser S (eds) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: costs, benefits and policy instruments. OECD, Paris
5. Agrawala S, Bosello F, Carraro C, de Cian E, Lanzi E (2011) Adapting to climate change: costs, benefits and modelling approaches. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2011(5):245–284
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献